The Millenial Milieu Mops More Meaning

[caption id="attachment_683" align="alignleft" width="300" caption="A Case Study in Missing the Point!"]

[/caption]

That's what I call alliteration!  Gen Y, Millenials, whatever you want to call them are the example for future generations to follow.  Pew Research has just published a very interesting study that looks at the lives of these teens and twenty somethings. The basic gist is that they are connected via technology, they are diverse, they are optimistic, and they becoming frustrated with the status quo.

Two things in particular stuck out at me.  First, this generation cares about the same things that generations past cared about: marriage and family.  This is something that I think is insightful.  We must come to terms with the reality that at the core of their being the emerging generations are people who are created in the image of God and their longings are going to be similar to those of the past.  This does not take away from the fact that they are going to express these longings differently.  For example, this generation is waiting longer to marry and begin their families.  Why? I think because men do not have a clearly defined entry into adulthood and because of "the economy stupid".

The second thing that interests me is the fact that this generation is already getting frustrated with politicians.  It was a generation that became highly motivated during the election and has not had their agenda delivered.  They believe that the government should help but are coming to realize that it might not be the answer they are looking for.

These two issues highlight for me where we, as the church, can step in and speak directly to this generation if we are willing to speak their language.  Will we show them the church of Jesus Christ that radically effects change or will we be another voice in the wilderness gonging away?  Will we teach them the principles of healthy marriages and families? Will we demonstrate for them these principles? I hope so.  If we are going to speak to this generation things will have to change in the church because we are not doing a very good job right now.

However, there is an example of this beginning to happen in my own little church.  There is a woman, named Robin, who is a part of our small group.  She is gathering young moms and empty nest moms together.  This is a time for encouragement and love. This is a time for the young moms to realize that they are not alone and that others have walked their paths.  This is a time when principles will be taught and demonstrated, not in some classroom, but in the context of life.

Friends, God is on the move and he cares about this generation and he wants them to hear his story and his message.  He desires for them to respond.  We are his ambassadors.  Will we speak the language? Will show and demonstrate? I hope so.

Read More

Magic 150

I am currently reading Malcolm Gladwell's The Tipping Point.  It's a fascinating read.  One of the things that has really stuck out to me is the chapter on Dunbar's number, 150.  This is the number of meaningful relationships that a person can have.  Human beings tend to only be able to handle 150 or fewer meaningful relationships.  Today, I ran across an article from MediaPost Publications that discusses the way that college students have their contacts broken down.

The study found that the average college student has, "Exactly 87 email contacts, 146 cell phone contacts, and 438 "friends" on social networks." What struck me was the cell phone contacts, 146.  My guess is that the people in the cell phone are those who are considered "meaningful" relationships.

In this article they add these numbers up to come up with an influence circle of 671.  However, I think that the real number is 146. These are the people who will actually respond to the student.  These are the people who will trust what they hear from the person.  My guess is that these 146 are duplicated in their social media and also in email.

146. That's awful close to 150. More thoughts on this to come...

Read More

I gots it...I gots it...

http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?lt1=_blank&bc1=FFFFFF&IS2=1&bg1=FFFFFF&fc1=000000&lc1=0000FF&t=danielmroseco-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&m=amazon&f=ifr&asins=0525951369 A number of weeks ago I reviewed Tim Keller's Counterfeit Gods.  Over the next few days I am going to work through this little book with some thoughts of my own.  I hope that you will find it to be a beneficial conversation. I hope that you will join in via the comments section.  I think that these posts will be timely during Lent which is a time of preparation and setting aside idols in our lives.

The opening chapter discusses the story of Abraham from the perspective of "what happens when you get all you ever wanted?" This is a great question!  As we consider our lives most of what we do is so that we can get what we want. We train and prepare for certain jobs so that we can make money. We take this money and we use it to buy what we want.  It might be a house, a car, some tech toy, or even the right clothes or the right look to get the right girl (or guy).

Some people never get what they want and this desire drives them throughout their lives. Many get what they want. When you do the question is, "now what?" As I look around this world I think people just begin the process to get the next bigger and better version of whatever our desire is.

As Keller points out, God often asks for this back. Why? It's because when we get what we want it becomes the center of our lives.  This "thing" displaces God.  This, according to Keller, is the center of the Abraham story.  Abraham got his son.  God asked for his son back and when Abraham was willing to give him it proved that Isaac was not the center of his life.  I think that this is a legitimate interpretation of the story.

As I consider my own life I think that there are a two things right now that need to be given back to God.  First, entertainment. I love to be entertained.  I enjoy an evening at home relaxing on the couch and taking in my latest DVR'ed goodness.  This time could be used to talk with my bride.  It could be spent reading.  It could be spent praying.  It could be spent...well you get the point. I do not think that relaxing with a good television show is all that bad.  I will continue to do so.  However, I think that it needs to be put in proper perspective and I need to make sure that it is not choice numero uno!

Second, the internet.  I love surfing the web and being in the know.  If you check out my strength finder profile you will see that input is one my strengths.  However, it can quickly become ruinous.  This is because I can spend hours gaining input, reading news, anything that will find my mind with new facts and details. Information gathering becomes central. Part of the reason for this blog is to help me slow down and communicate out some of what I am inputting through out my daily routine.

What about you? What is displacing God in your life?

Read More

Coming Apart at the Seams: Hebrews 1:5-2:4

A sermon on Hebrews 1:5-2:4

[podcast]http://danielmrose.com/wp-content/uploads/Grace-100221-reduced.mp3[/podcast]

Read More

Coming Apart at the Seams - Hebrews 1:1-4

A sermon on Hebrews 1:1-4

[podcast]http://danielmrose.com/wp-content/uploads/Grace-100214-reduced.mp3[/podcast]

Read More

Shall I...think?

One of the things that I have been struck with over the past few months is that many people are unwilling to think and even more unwilling to listen.  We have been trained to process what we will say next and as a result we do not hear what is being said to us.  It is this phenomenon that I think leads us to the place where we no longer actually think. Thinking requires listening and processing.  One of the places that I have been finding this to be true is in the context of book reviews.  Most recently has been the discussion that has been going on over Brian McLaren's most recent book, "A New Kind of Christianity".  I do not have this book.  I have not read this book.  My point is not to enter into conversation about McLaren or his writing but to look at the way that the conversation has been going forward.

The men and women who have responded to McLaren's latest title are brilliant people (at least the ones I have read) and have presented critiques that I am sure need to be made.  What I found most interesting was the interaction between McLaren and Bill Kinnon.  This is the first time I have read Kinnon's blog and so I do not have a vast working knowledge of his writing.

The posts between the two men are long. So let me summarize:

• Kinnon: Brian, I have these questions.


• Brian: Bill, you don't understand me.

Is this a bit of reductionistic, tongue-in-cheek, hyperbole? Sure. But, the point is that it seems that Kinnon and McLaren simply speak past one another.  It is as if they both have a perspective and they are not willing to think the other person's point.  This is a microcosm of what we see on Capitol Hill everyday in the "bipartisan" conversation.

It seems to me that we would be much better served to slow down and listen. This listening will cause us to think.  Thinking might lead us to realize that there is much middle ground upon which we can agree on.  Will there be outliers that we will ALWAYS disagree about? Yes. But, what if, and I am just spit-balling here, what if we found common ground and moved forward?

Oh wait, that last idea does not sell books or drive site traffic. (Sorry that might be a bit too cynical or not.)

Read More

The Spirit vs The Letter

I have had a few conversations over the last couple of days about rule following.  What does it mean to follow the rules? What is the line between the letter and spirit of the law? How do we determine this? What is the impact on our spiritual lives? What if following the letter of the law causes injury? What if following the spirit of the law is just our way of undermining authority? These are the questions that have been batted around in my world. These conversations have been stimulating and interesting. I am not sure though if we have dealt with the issue well.

I think that the biggest question that needs to be dealt with is that of determination.  How do we determine when to set aside the letter of the law in favor of its spirit?  This line is gray.  There is no ideal or final answer in my opinion.  However, I think there are some principles that we can follow.

1. In following the spirit of the law are we negating the law completely?


2. In following the spirit of the law are we taking seriously the reasons for the law?


3. In following the spirit of the law are we doing so for our own selfish gain?


4. In following the spirit of the law are we simply not willing to accept the consequences for breaking the law?

These questions are the ones that I believe need to be answered as we try to determine when we are indeed following the spirit of the law as opposed to simply breaking the law.  If we can answer these questions appropriately then we are indeed in line with an ethically acceptably response to the law.

What say you? How do you determine whether or not you are in step with the spirit of the law?

Read More

The Quest to Be Unconventional

I like to think.  I like to think new things and seek to develop original ideas.  I also enjoy reading and interacting with those who think in fresh ways.  One of the people who I enjoy reading is David Fitch.  He is a missiologist who is calling the church to be local and missional. He understands that the gospel needs to be contextualized to particular local contexts without undermining its narrative truth.

That being said, I think that David does something in a recent post which is not authentic. He is discussing how to deal with conflict in the community of believers.  He evaluates two approaches which are highlighted in the work of Al Mohler and Brian McLaren.  He argues that neither of their approaches (autocratic or democratic) fit with the biblical model and he calls for a "new" approach, the incarnational.

I want to briefly summarize this approach:

• People in disagreement are encouraged to discuss one on one.


• If there is continued disagreement three or four are brought together.


• If there is continued disagreement the acknowledged leaders are brought into the conversation.


• If there is continued disagreement the issue is brought before the whole church.

If this sounds strangely familiar it is because it is.  This is what we find in Matthew 18.  It is also the methodology outlined in the Book of Order for the Evangelical Presbyterian Church. I appreciate that David is calling the church back to this reality.  I agree with his conclusions. What I struggle with is that he encapsulates the call in language that makes it sound like a "new" thing.

I think we need to be careful about a quest for the unconventional that does not credit the past rightly.  I also think that we need to look around and notice that many of the processes put in place by those who have come before us are good and helpful.

Read More

Give it away, Give it away, Give it away now!

I love the moment when an idea flashes in my mind and I grab hold of it and it turns into something worthwhile. This happened a number of weeks ago when I was hanging out with a friend of mine named Zak.  I was asking him about his friends and what kind of context they would most likely come out to for a conversation about spiritual things. He said that a coffee house would be best.  In that moment, what would come to be called Coffee/Doubt, was born.

An idea became a vision which became a mission.

Things started slow but momentum has been growing and continues to grow.  The beautiful thing though is that it's not really mine.  It's Zak's.  He own this things.  Last Thursday there were sixteen adults and kids sitting at Starbucks for a conversation and Zak led it.  Zak is a 16 year old guy who gets fat lips in mosh-pits and has two rings in his lower lip.  He is not evangelical Christendom's poster child which looks likes this:

I love the fact that this is not mine.  I love that it's Zak's!  For an idea to become mission it requires ownership.  Who owns your ideas?  Are you giving it away?

Read More

To Age or Not to Age

Time/CNN recently published an article about scientists who are trying to figure out the "peter pan" gene.  They are trying to understand how to slow down and even cease the aging process.  While this sounds like a very cool idea I have to wonder if this is a good idea. I think we must ask the simple question, "Should we?"

We come face to face with issues regarding global climate change which is in part due to world population growth.  Sustainability is also a buzz word that we hear on an almost daily basis.  We must find ways to use natural resources in such a way that we can sustain their use over the long term.  We are told that by living longer we are making this more difficult.  What if we are able to unnaturally extend the lives of people? What would this mean for our world?

I think that it is time for us to slow down and begin asking some questions about the effects of our endeavors.  Wendell Berry in his collection of essays called Sex, Economy, Freedom, and Community often says that as we seek to find solutions through science we will inevitably create even more problems.  I think that this is often true.  When it comes to any scientific and technological "breakthroughs" we must determine their value not only based on the immediate impact but also on the ramifications of the breakthrough.

What do you think? How do we answer the question of "should we?"

Read More

I am good enough, smart enough, and...oh, never mind!

Do you want to know what I really hate? I really hate coming to the realization that I do not know what to do. I can not stand that feeling of helplessness that comes over me when I am out of my depths.

I had that feeling this past weekend.  I was driving home from a youth retreat and pulled off the highway to get a tank of gas.  After filling the tank the car would not start.  I had someone with me and I just wanted to be able to get this guy home.  We were stuck.  I could not fix it because I know nothing about cars.  Then I had to enter into the process of asking people for help.  It's embarrassing because most of the times the issue that is causing my car problems is some "easy" fix. That feeling is horrible.

I had a conversation that Sunday with a man I deeply respect named Jim, he was taking me to buy a battery and to help me install it.  He said, "Dan, you spend your whole life serving others, why do you have such a hard time letting other people serve you?"  That has been the question that has stuck in my mind since.  Why?

I don't like letting people serve me because I believe I live an amazing life.  I believe that God has so graciously given me all I need to provide for my family.  I see the body of Christ constantly meeting any need my family has and it is an honor to serve them. It seems that it is not fair to keep asking.

Yet, this is what being in a community is all about.  It is about people with differing gifts and skills serving one another.  Helping one another.  Caring for one another.  Consider what Paul says in 1 Corinthians:

14 For the body does not consist of one member but of many.15 If the foot should say, Because I am not a hand, I do not belong to the body, that would not make it any less a part of the body.16 And if the ear should say, Because I am not an eye, I do not belong to the body, that would not make it any less a part of the body.17 If the whole body were an eye, where would be the sense of hearing? If the whole body were an ear, where would be the sense of smell?18 But as it is, God arranged the members in the body, each one of them, as he chose.19 If all were a single member, where would the body be?20 As it is, there are many parts, yet one body.

God has, in his goodness and grace, given me gifts of leadership and teaching.  I am not a mechanic.  I can barely change a light bulb.  According to Paul this is God's intention for us.  I think this is so that we will never be able to "know ourselves by ourselves" as Wendell Berry says.  We are designed to be in a community and we can only be who we are in a community. It must be time to embrace this reality.

What holds you back from entering into community?

Read More

Time Out!

So, this week has turned into chaos.  It's Monday. What's up you ask? Well, I led a youth retreat this past weekend.  On my return trip my 2007 Jeep Compass died in Dexter, MI.  Thankfully, Dan Jones one of the youth pastors from Ward Church in Northville, MI was with me.  However, it has added a layer of complexity that is frustrating.

Today, (Monday, February 8 ) I had to report to the jury pool at the Frank Murphy Hall of Justice in Downtown Detroit. I am now "Juror 12" on a trial. Another level of complexity, which would typically be a fun thing but this week is an annoyance.

I am preaching at Grace Chapel on Sunday, teaching a Sunday School class, and leading two Small Groups this weekend. So, with jury duty eating up my  days, sermon prep is now moved to the evenings.  This leaves little time to write. I will be back next week.

Read More

Kicking Butt for Jesus or "I Smacked the Other Cheek" or "I am Going to Beat the Hell (literally) Out Of You"

The New York Times published an article recently about the rise of Mixed Martial Arts being used as an outreach by evangelical churches for men. I know that guys like Mark Driscoll are all over this and that men are drawn to MMA and that God is using it. I am not going to lie to you, I enjoy a little Fight Club and some MMA myself.  However, I am concerned by some of the statements that I read in the article. Here a few of them:

• “Compassion and love — we agree with all that stuff, too,” said Brandon Beals, 37, the lead pastor at Canyon Creek Church outside of Seattle. “But what led me to find Christ was that Jesus was a fighter.”


• These pastors say the marriage of faith and fighting is intended to promote Christian values, quoting verses like “fight the good fight of faith” from Timothy 6:12. Several put the number of churches taking up mixed martial arts at roughly 700 of an estimated 115,000 white evangelical churches in America.


• “The man should be the overall leader of the household,” said Ryan Dobson, 39, a pastor and fan of mixed martial arts who is the son of James C. Dobson, the founder of Focus on the Family, a prominent evangelical group. “We’ve raised a generation of little boys.”

First, I agree that the church has "wussified" men.  We have cut men's legs out from underneath them and have asked them to be "nice".  We want them to share their "feelings" and hold hands, yada, yada.  Second, I agree that we must change the way we do things and bring masculinity back to the church and help men to embrace who they are as men: leaders, strong, and kind.

[caption id="attachment_609" align="alignleft" width="134" caption="Pretty Jesus"]

[/caption]

However, I grow concerned when we begin training men in the way of violence.  This is in such contrast to the life of Jesus that we will be doing more harm than good.  Jesus is not the feminine, blue eyed, long haired pretty boy but a rough necked, back woods Jewish carpenter.  He was strong.  He had convictions that he was willing to die for.  He also displayed compassion, grace, restraint and kindness.  We must realize that kindness is very different from being "nice".  Being "nice" means that you are a push over.  You are a doormat that people walk all over.  Being kind means that you are strong enough to tell people what they need to hear and how they need to act with honesty, compassion, and gentleness.  It means that you can love well in spite of the potential of loss.

Jesus demonstrated ridiculous amounts of restraint.  Have you ever wondered what it must have been like to be in possession of the full power of God?  Jesus could have wiped out his enemies with one fell swoop.  He did not. He held back.  He taught the value of restraint and that in his restraint there was great power.  It was in his restraint where he chose to bear the cross, "scorning it's shame for the joy set before him." Jesus did not need to beat the tar out of someone to prove he was a man.







[caption id="attachment_610" align="alignright" width="121" caption="Fighting Jesus"]

[/caption]



He did it by being strong in the face of adversity.  He did it by standing up to the imperial and religious leaders at the cost of his life.  He did it by choosing to live a life of obedience to his father.  He did it by demanding respect through his words and deeds.

So, we raise a generation of Spartan-like boys into Spartan-like men for Jesus.  What does this get us? It gets us men who subdue their wives through anger and rage.  It gets us men who do not understand kindness but only power.  It gets us men who are willing beat their opponents into submission through violence as opposed to loving well with powerful kindness, compassion, and mercy.

Finally, I would suggest that the MMA Church take some time to study and understand the ramifications of their actions in light of Matthew 5, I will quote it below (oh and this is Jesus speaking, just saying):

Matthew 5

1 Seeing the crowds, he went up on the mountain, and when he sat down, his disciples came to him. 2 And he opened his mouth and taught them, saying:

3 Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

4Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted.

5 Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.

6 Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall be satisfied.

7 Blessed are the merciful, for they shall receive mercy.

8 Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.

9 Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.

10 Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness' sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

11 Blessed are you when others revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account.12 Rejoice and be glad, for your reward is great in heaven, for so they persecuted the prophets who were before you.

13 You are the salt of the earth, but if salt has lost its taste, how shall its saltiness be restored? It is no longer good for anything except to be thrown out and trampled under people's feet.

14 You are the light of the world. A city set on a hill cannot be hidden.15 Nor do people light a lamp and put it under a basket, but on a stand, and it gives light to all in the house.16 In the same way, let your light shine before others, so that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father who is in heaven.

17 Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.18 For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished.19 Therefore whoever relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever does them and teaches them will be called great in the kingdom of heaven.20 For I tell you, unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.

21 You have heard that it was said to those of old, You shall not murder; and whoever murders will be liable to judgment.22 But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother will be liable to the council; and whoever says, You fool! will be liable to the hell of fire.23 So if you are offering your gift at the altar and there remember that your brother has something against you,24 leave your gift there before the altar and go. First be reconciled to your brother, and then come and offer your gift.25 Come to terms quickly with your accuser while you are going with him to court, lest your accuser hand you over to the judge, and the judge to the guard, and you be put in prison.26 Truly, I say to you, you will never get out until you have paid the last penny.

27 You have heard that it was said, You shall not commit adultery.28 But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart.29 If your right eye causes you to sin, tear it out and throw it away. For it is better that you lose one of your members than that your whole body be thrown into hell.30 And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away. For it is better that you lose one of your members than that your whole body go into hell.

31 It was also said, Whoever divorces his wife, let him give her a certificate of divorce.32 But I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except on the ground of sexual immorality, makes her commit adultery, and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.

33 Again you have heard that it was said to those of old, You shall not swear falsely, but shall perform to the Lord what you have sworn.34 But I say to you, Do not take an oath at all, either by heaven, for it is the throne of God,35 or by the earth, for it is his footstool, or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King.36 And do not take an oath by your head, for you cannot make one hair white or black.37 Let what you say be simply Yes or No; anything more than this comes from evil.

38 You have heard that it was said, An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.39 But I say to you, Do not resist the one who is evil. But if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.40 And if anyone would sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well.41 And if anyone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles.42 Give to the one who begs from you, and do not refuse the one who would borrow from you.

43 You have heard that it was said, You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.44 But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you,45 so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven. For he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust.46 For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same?47 And if you greet only your brothers, what more are you doing than others? Do not even the Gentiles do the same?48 You therefore must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect.

Read More

State of the State

Over the last two weeks we have witnessed both the federal State of the Union, Michigan's State of the State, and ESPN's State of Sports. It has been interesting two weeks.  Many conversations about politics and ideas about how to fix the country and the state. What has been most interesting is that people on both sides of the political aisle seem to believe that their position on every issue is what will make the world better.

When we consider how to respond to the issues and problems before us we must look at them from a different perspective.  We can no longer expect a political party to represent "us".  Political parties simply represent those who pay to get them into office. There is little to no accountability. We must realize that the political corporation is the imperial power that we live in the face of right now. There is one simple concern that career politicians desire: power.

Power is something that those who claim to follow Christ need to look for in a different place.  We do not find power in taking control of others.  We find power in relationship with the crucified and resurrected Christ.  This means that if we are going to make change in our community and culture we must look to the way of Christ and find solutions there.  The reality is that the solutions are there. What might they be?

They are found in balancing justice and productivity.  How do we do this? We do this by seeking local development in agriculture, business, and education.  We do this by understanding the process by which various goods and services get to us and into our homes.   We have to make choices in light of creation mandate that requires sustainability. We also must be creative and look beyond the technological for solutions.  People and their relationships with one another are crucial to the fixing of this place.

There is nothing easy about any of this.  We must rise above the din of political fury and realize that there is a subversive way to go about changing the economic reality of our local, state, and federal collectives. They are found in the way of self-sacrifice, community development, and seeking justice.  You can call me naïve. That is fine. But if you do, would you at least be willing to dream with me about what could be if we applied the redemptive and subversive principles found in the joy of the redemption parade?

Read More

Leadership 2.0 - I Need an Upgrade!

Michael Hyatt the CEO of Thomas Nelson recently published a blog on what he calls "Leadership 2.0" and it really fits into some of things that I have been wrestling with in light of my series on Leading With a Limp.  Here are his bullet points on Leadership 2.0:

1. 
   Leadership 2.0 embraces change. Like Web 1.0, old-style leadership was fairly static. Leaders resisted change and were more focused on preserving the status quo. However, Leadership 2.0 embraces change. New-style leaders are on the cutting edge of experimentation. If something doesn’t work, they change course quickly. They are more concerned about driving the right outcomes than maintaining business-as-usual.


2. 
   Leadership 2.0 demonstrates transparency. Old-style leaders were opaque. They wouldn’t tell you anything they didn’t have to tell you. They kept themselves shrouded in mystery. (Think of “Oz.”) New-style leaders are open and transparent. They let you see them for who they are—warts and all. They risk self-disclosure, preferring to acknowledge the truth of who they are rather than pretend to be something they are not.


3. 
   Leadership 2.0 celebrates dialogue. Old-style leaders delivered a monologue. They did all the talking. The fact that they were the boss was proof enough that they were smarter than everyone else n the room. New-style leaders listen more than they talk. They ask questions. They lead powerful conversations. Why? Because they know that “all of us are smarter than some of us” to quote James Surowiecki in The Wisdom of Crowds.


4. 
   Leadership 2.0 employs collaboration. Old-style leaders were competitive. They held all the cards close to their vest. They didn’t “play well with others.” They refused to help anyone they perceived as the competition, even if they were theoretically on the same team. New-style leaders are all about teamwork. They are inclusive in the way they lead, drawing you in and making you feel that you are doing something great—together. They enroll others as “colleagues” and “partners.”


5. 
   Leadership 2.0 practices sharing. Old-style leaders hoarded their resources—their contacts, their insights, their time, energy and money. They played a zero-sum game. They didn’t believe they could be generous without depleting their own pile of stuff. New-style leaders are just the opposite. They have an abundance-mentality. They freely share their resources, believing that “there is plenty more where that came from.” They know “it is more blessed to give than to receive” (see Acts 20:35)


6. 
   Leadership 2.0 welcomes engagement. Old-style leaders were aloof and detached. They didn’t expect to get their hands dirty by actually talking to customers and other constituents. They stood above the fray, dispassionately observing the masses. New-style leaders don’t think in terms of hierarchy, as if something is beneath them. They jump in with both feet, happily and passionately engaging with anyone and everyone.


7. 
   Leadership 2.0 builds community. Old-style leaders were rugged individualists. They pulled themselves up by their own bootstraps. They didn’t need anyone else. They could do it all themselves, “thank you very much.” New-style leaders, on the other hand, enjoy working with others and building a sustainable community that will go on long after they are gone. They get great satisfaction from working together rather than working alone.

As I consider these seven points I realize that much of my intentional leadership development took place from 1995-1998.  This is at the height of Leadership 1.0.  I am struggling now to really engage in become a leader who leads from a Leadership 2.0 standpoint.  This is necessary if we are going to faithfully engage with the emerging generations. They are being trained on the Leadership 2.0 model and expect those who lead them to do the same.

I think that I struggle deeply with numbers 4 and 6.  I find it hard to really embrace engagement with people. I have a vision, mission, and dream.  I am willing to do what it takes to get it done. However, it's very difficult for me to bring others along for the ride. I also struggle with collaboration when it comes to my vision and dream.  I do not necessarily want nor do I think that I need other people's input.  This is a shortcoming and I am finding that I am learning, ever be it slowly, that I am better with others than alone.

How about you? Are you a Leader 2.0 or do you struggle as I do?

Read More

Why Lost

There are few TV shows that capture the imagination.  There are many that are entertaining.  There are many that make you laugh.  Occasionally one might make you think. However, I can't think of many that actually capture the imagination. ABC's Lost is just that.  It captures your imagination. It's the uncomfortable balance between what is, what could be, and what needs to be. It has characters that are real and unreal.  It asks you to suspend reality and also invites into reality. But what about it catches the imagination? I think you can sum it up in one word: Redemption.

There are two articles floating around the internet that catch onto this reality. One was written recently by Jeff Jensen over at EW and the other was from Mikal Gilmore over at Rolling Stone. Both of these articles were sent to me by my friend Kristin. To me the greatest insight into this show comes from Carlton Cuse one of the producers:

"The focus on redemption," says Cuse, "is something that is endlessly fascinating to both Damon and me — the fact that we are all sort of imperfect as people. Our characters are in extreme circumstances. They've confronted on the island various manifestations of the exact issues that they struggled with as people their whole lives. We feel there's an incredible universality to that. It's the human journey. Redemption is something that everyone seeks, and that's something we try to hold out in the show. If we acknowledge our imperfection, and if we ask for forgiveness for our imperfection, are we able to actually reset the clock?"

This is what captures our imagination.  Can we find redemption? Is it possible? I think that Jensen is on to something when we hits on the theme of the book of Luke: Lost. He points out that the number sequence in Lost, 4, 8, 15, 16, 23 and 42 (the last chapter of Luke is 24 which is an inversion of 42) all correlate to passages in Luke's narrative that hit on lostness. In particular I want to touch on Luke 15 which is the most popular of the Luke "lost" passages.

The lost theme in Luke 15 is counteracted by the searching theme.  The woman, the shepherd, and father all are in search for what it is that they lost.  These  people that we meet in Lost, these stories that we encounter all point to the brokenness of individuals which leads to a collective brokenness. They are all lost.  Not simply because they crashed on an island that nobody can find but they are lost because their lives are broken.  The crash seems arbitrary but those that begin to see that it was not begin to find this elusive redemption.  It is as if there is someone looking for them.

I think that we get the clearest hint of this in the story of Desmond and Penny.  The Luke 15 connections here are endless.  However, it is in the relationship that we have some closure.  We have a sense that Desmond has found his Penny.  He celebrates.  He rejoices.  He also realizes that he still has a role to play in helping others find their redemption. He does reluctantly but he helps even after his redemption is found.

Lost captures the imagination because it captures our longing for redemption.  Redemption. Have you found what you're looking for?

Read More